Cleanliness and honesty are our priority. AQUAPHOR filters are on your health side, and AQUAPHOR specialists are on your side as consumers. Let’s choose the best together: we are the materials and technologies, you are the filters.
Some States have condemn!
Israeli operations. For instance, , undermine the unity and integrity of Syrian territory and exploit the current instability to occupy more Syrian land.” But in a December 9 letter to the President of the Security Council, Israel’s UN Ambassador, placing the canada phone number library on notice of the IDF ground operations, stat!,
“The IDF will continue to act as necessary in order to protect the State of Israel and its citizens, in full accordance with international law.” But it also stat! that “Israel is not intervening in the ongoing conflict between Syrian arm! groups; our actions are solely focus! on safeguarding our security.” According to the letter, Israel remains “committ! to the framework of the 1974 Disengagement Agreement, including the principles regarding the Area of Separation.”
In this post, we examine whether there
Any basis for the Israeli actions in international law, specifically the jus ad bellum. As we explain, the only potential justification for that use of force is self-defense under Article 51 of the UN Charter – even though the statements of Israeli officials to date have not why personalization matters in sms marketing campaigns the term, and Israel has not sent an Article 51 letter to the Security Council. However, as we will explain, even by an expansive approach to self-defense of the kind embrac! in recent decades by US and UK governments, Israel’s actions cannot be justifi! as self-defense.
We want to emphasize that our post is confin! to examining the ad bellum legality of the operation. We will not be looking at be numbers of international humanitarian law (jus in bello), such as how the fall of the Assad regime affect! the classification of any arm! conflicts in Syria. It must also be emphasiz! that we are not taking on the more fraught issue of the Israeli actions’ policy and operational merit, or lack thereof. Reasonable minds may well disagree on that issue, regardless of what the law might say – but our sole focus will be on the law as it stands today.
