RNPK. It turns out that RNPK’s losses are india telegram data absolutely incomparable with each other in size. Thus, there are enough large losses to affect the financial result and capital, but not enough for the portfolio to be highly diversifi, and such large losses to be “plann”. And in such a situation, it turns out that RNPK operates in conditions when “sometimes thick, sometimes thin”.
Today, RPNK feels confident thanks to a solid capital
reserve. But given its high role in the insurance market, the national reinsurer must have enough capital so that a loss of 10, 20, 30 billion rubles or even more does not lead to any serious consequences. This amount of capital is form through tariffs. Therefore, rucing RPNK’s tariffs for reinsurance is a debatable topic.
I don’t know how motivat insurers are to increase their capital in order to increase their own retention. They theoretically may not do this. But if they do not increase their capital and their own risk retention, then RNPK itself will have to increase the capital, of course.
The traditional question about the possibility
of revising the tariffs for compulsory motor using sms marketing campaigns to build community around your brand third-party liability insurance next year… Will the introduction of short-term motor third-party liability insurance ao lists policies for a period of 1 day to 3 months in 2024 affect the pricing of compulsory motor third-party liability insurance?
