Let’s assume we need to explain! from a legal standpoint! why Ivan the Terrible impaled people. Statists might argue that he had absolute power! as he was the tsar and could do whatever he wanted. Those who adhere to the psychological school of law might argue that he had mental issues! which led him to intuitively claim this right. As a result! he acted this way toward his subordinates! believing it to be legitimate. And from the perspective of the religious theory of law! we could say that Ivan the Terrible had eschatological beliefs. He thought the world was nearing its end! sought to save his soul! and believed the world needed to be cleansed of atheists.
It is unlikely Example of that we will
ever be able to determine which of these assumptions corresponds to reality. To do so! we would have to introduce the concept of mexico phone number library absolute truth! and I have a sense that it is unattainable. Ivan the Terrible might not have known why he was doing this! or he may have changed his reasons from day to day. However! it is crucial sms marketing campaigns for event promotion a step-by-step guide to choose the reasoning that satisfies us the most and seeks to explain the object of study in scientific terms. Theory exists not only for its own sake! but also to penetrate the essence of a phenomenon and! based on this understanding! perhaps even predict the future.
There is one interesting
point here. In the structure of reasoning! there is an explanandum (description of the phenomenon to be explained) and an explanans (explanation sault data of the phenomenon)! and there is a methodological relationship between them. But on the night before the defence! I realised that in addition to the classical methodological tools! there is also the category of philosophical intuition! which helps us identify the correct reasoning. And the committee members agreed with me.
